Jul. 21, 2025
Measurement & Analysis Instruments
If you have seen one before, the PM is unlikely to have generated it. It is a very old piece of analogue equipment from . With a few rare exceptions most models only generated 4:3 patterns. More likely that it was generated by a PT5xxx series sync generator (first introduced in ). Check out my test cards YouTube channel for recordings from them.
If you are looking for more details, kindly visit SUIN.
UPDATE: I now have a YouTube video covering the PM. The remaining information on this page should be regarded as historic.
I also have a video about PT5xxx sync generators:
If so please get in touch. I have searched for documentation for the PM for many years now to no avail!
In my recent quest to build an analogue television broadcast modulation setup it occurred to me that I’m going to need a good pattern generator to calibrate the modulator. Two months later and this has now turned into a massive distraction.
So off to the usual place and I’ve got a few new bits of kit to look at.
The PM is probably most useful for my intended application because it’s easy to pick out a specific pattern to test exactly what I want. This particular one is notated “MP” (multi-pattern). I have not seen any example of a non multi-pattern unit. These appear to have hit the market around / certainly at the time I purchased mine there were units for sale made around this time. Mine is a tad newer dated .
The PM is test equipment, generating up to 100 different simple patterns such as colour bars. There is a YouTube video where someone has cycled through most of the patterns.
I am intrigued as to how these things actually work. The assembly doing the pattern generation is the one in the centre. Fitted to it are four BPROMS and a single EPROM. It appears that all of these, combined with the CPU are somehow cleverly generating a huge number of different patterns with frankly very little ROM space.
The assembly on the left is the sync generator and external sync input. The assembly on the right is the one doing the digital to analogue signal conversion plus luma and chroma mixing.
I actually ended up with two of these which both appear to be quite different despite very similar appearance. The PM appears to have been based on the PM. It uses the same chassis, power supply, sync board, internal layout and a very similar design approach.
The key difference is that the PM’s patterns are mostly rasterised whereas the PM’s are simple vector based patterns. The PM has broadcast niceties like a phase locked 1 KHz audio tone generator and a time code input connector.
Unlike the PM these units both came programmed with a single complex pattern. This particular unit appears to be the earliest and most primitive design. It has 576KB of pattern ROM and is effectively hard wired for 4:3 patterns typical of the previous generation PM55xx designs. The hardware design assumes that the edges of the pattern are repeating in nature (i.e. it uses sprites). Only the centre is allowed to contain rasterised graphics.
The EPROMs are split into three banks giving a YUV 4:2:2 arrangement (10-bit/8-bit/8-bit) – Luminance (5 chips), Chroma R-Y (2 chips) and Chroma B-Y (2 chips). The three banks of EPROMs are in turn connected to three DACs – Raytheon N7C1 (TDC) for the luminance, and two Signetics DAC-08’s for the chrominance. The signals are then modulated into the composite output using a pair of OQP’s (TCA240). Generation of the colour components has to be done separately because these are able to synchronise to a black and burst signal.
There are four known variations of these units:
All are programmed with the Philips 4:3 colour circle pattern like the below:
The above pattern is the PAL version. The patterns for other standards are (slightly) different.
The mechanism for programming station text into the black boxes is different for the PM. On the PM this was done by soldering a matrix of wire links onto a card installed into the unit.
On these units it has to be done with either the PM logo generator or programming a pattern of the text into the four luminance EPROMs. The advantage is that significantly higher resolution text and graphics are possible than on the PM55xx series where text typically appears quite “blocky”.
The disadvantage is that it requires extra hardware or a computer and specialised software to do it. From looking at a catalogue page (at the bottom of this post) Philips did offer pattern customisation, likely for quite a price.
I’ve partially reverse engineered this unit. There’s a project on GitHub which generates the above image from the pattern ROMs.
Hidden underneath the front panel are a few buttons. I pressed them all in various combinations to see what they did. I turns out there are a couple of options for the appearance of the pattern:
This version of the PM cannot generate the actual clock. The DACs are only connected to the EPROMs which means moving pattern elements are not possible. This has to be done by a separate teletext generator.
This is how it is done with the PM (PM successor) although there was space inside the actual generator for the unit which did this, an item which was sold by Philips. In the case of the PM there was an optional add-on (PM) which generates station text and a clock. They may also have used other equipment capable of text overlay, more likely to meet their differing requirements.
There is an image on Flickr showing a real broadcast in this mode. Like almost all Philips circle patterns pictured on the internet it is stated to be “PM” but I think that might be incorrect as the 4:3 PM existed in and the pattern shown in that image is missing the bottom box reflection check which is typical of the PM.
A very interesting and peculiar unit programmed with this pattern:
It’s a Philips take on the RCA “Indian-head” pattern (monochrome). Popular on the American continent decades ago. My discovery of this pattern is the first image of it that has ever appeared on the public internet. The story behind it is presently unknown. Suffice to say it was probably made to order.
An editor of the Indian-head Wikipedia page notes:
In October , a 4:3 monochrome test card that resembles the Indian-head test pattern was discovered in an EPROM chip of a Philips PM PAL generator purchased by a British television repairman from a European scrap dealer.
If you are looking for more details, kindly visit Digital Pattern Generators.
(Sure, I’ll take it)
Despite a very similar appearance to the colour circle pattern unit the operation of this unit is completely different. It has 4 MiB of pattern ROM. In addition to having a larger number of vertical samples per line than the other unit ( vs approx 700) it can display any rasterised pattern thus is not limited to PM55xx type patterns like the other unit.
Although it is fitted with chrominance EPROMs programmed with nothing but the colourburst it was supplied to me with the chrominance carrier electrically disabled i.e. it does not even produce a colourburst – generating a true monochrome signal.
I cannot find any other documented examples of a PM like this unit. Like the other unit, it is a PAL (G) model. Although there is no known example of it, this design may be one that can accommodate the well known 16:9 colour circle pattern due to its higher line resolution and ability to render arbitrary rasterised patterns.
The SECAM unit is of a completely different design to the PAL and NTSC versions. This is because SECAM cannot synchronise at a colour sub-carrier level, thus much of the complexity of the PAL/NTSC designs is not required.
The sync board is a different (simpler) design. All of the chrominance circuitry is omitted too, essentially there is no point in fitting it. Instead Philips modulated the colour subcarrier into the luminance EPROMs likely using the same software tools they used to generate the EPROMs for the PALplus unit discussed later on this page.
Also missing is the black and burst circuitry on the rear, once again, there is no such concept in SECAM.
Another interesting feature on the rear PCB is a 10 MHz TCXO instead of the usual colour subcarrier oscillator. Not sure what this is doing.
Above is a PM with the PM logo generator installed (highlighted in red). It does the same job as the PM teletext generator (PM/ accessory) but is a lot more advanced. It can overlay text and graphical logos in the top and bottom black boxes, and optionally can overlay a clock. They are typically only installed in units used in broadcast, which unfortunately rarely find their way to the second hand market thus it is unlikely to find a PM fitted with one. I have never seen one myself.
It is rather unfortunate to be talking about the PM without also discussing what it is most known for. They are difficult to find because broadcasting over analogue infrastructure was short lived and not done at all in many countries that originally adopted the PM/PM or by that time they had around-the-clock programming thus there was no air-time for test cards anyway.
The scarcity turned out to be a pain in the backside. Until now there has basically been no information on the internet about what equipment actually generates the well known widescreen pattern other than “It’s the PM” (even though inconveniently all of the units found by enthusiasts only contain 4:3 patterns).
After reaching out to a lot of equipment dealers I managed to turn up not one, but two widescreen PM’s. Let’s have a look:
As was to be expected (from looking at the front it it) internally it is almost identical to the 4:3 models. It has a bunch of buttons on the front panel that we don’t see on the 4:3 models. The 4:3 models technically do have a few buttons but they are hidden under the front panel.
The million dollar question – what pattern does it generate?
It has already been pointed out to me by an eagle eyed reader, before I even wrote this, that it’s different to the pattern produced by the PALplus model. Can you spot the differences? Here is a transmission using it from Belgium. The most interesting feature to me is the inclusion of a ridiculous 5.8 MHz grating; something that would never be seen when received on-air. In the PAL B/G system that would end up right in the middle of the NICAM carrier.
You may have seen that in relation to the Indian head unit I speculated that one like this may exist which generates 16:9 patterns. I was correct. This unit, like the Indian head unit has a 20 MHz DAC clock (higher than the usual 13.5 MHz for 4:3 models). It also is loaded with larger 27C EPROMs and is capable of addressing much larger patterns (>576KB) than the 4:3 models. The surprise (!) is that this has been done by post production re-work:
In conclusion I believe the Indian head unit is the final hardware for the 16:9 product. I have since confirmed that it is able to produce the 16:9 pattern without any post-production re-work purely by swapping all of the EPROMs and three PALs. The G/924 unit I’ve shown here is a prototype. It has a bunch of other patterns too. They are not very interesting. I’ll probably details these in future.
As expected as the last unit this one is totally and utterly different to anything I have seen before. It has a s–tload of EPROMs and PALs in it. It took me nearly two hours to dump them all. A couple of interesting points: 1) It does not have any PALplus encoding chips in it. 2) There is only one DAC. I strongly suspect that the entire signal: PALplus, luma, chroma is modulated digitally.
So what pattern does it generate?
That one (almost). I do not have a PALplus capable television to show you this one on unfortunately. I can only view an embarrassingly low quality version in 4:3 compatibility mode. In future I’ll try and find a PALplus TV to view it on.
It also generates this pattern:
Broadly speaking it has three modes: PALplus, 4:3 and “Custom” which it complains is not available in that particular unit.
Within each mode there is a variety of different patterns, either the colour circle pattern or a bunch of different simple monochrome patterns.
There are some minor options like VITS generation and other PALplus specific stuff i.e. enable/disable helper signals. Finally it has the option to show pre-programmed teletext in the black boxes i.e. “PALplus 16:9” but it cannot be edited.
To make matters more confusing the above image from this magazine shows a pattern apparently generated by the PM/85 but actually looking more like the first unit. It may be that they didn’t have an up-to-date shot of the pattern of what at the time was a new product?
Check out my GitHub repository where I keep technical information i.e. manuals, schematics for this type of equipment.
See the catalogue page below:
Just because it looks like a Philips test pattern, that does not mean the equipment that generated it was made by Philips. By the s it was the wild west in terms of whose equipment generated what pattern. Philips were cranking out PM’s that generated Tekefunken’s FuBK pattern and RCA’s Indian head pattern. Consider the above, the “SGPF” from Rohde & Schwarz. It offers the same patterns, and many of the same features of the PM. There are many others too.
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Are you interested in learning more about Low Cost Function Generator? Contact us today to secure an expert consultation!
I've been thinking of getting one for awhile. I just had one of those cheap eBay arduino based DDS boards, which did alright for my needs given the cost ($14 or something I paid for it.).
But every time I decided to get a proper func gen I couldn't decide on which one to get and I kept using the little arduino one.
I've been watching EBay for good used deals on one for months but I didn't find anything I liked. I don't use the sig gen often and it doesn't make sense to spend a lot of money on one, it also didnt make sense to get a large unit for something I only use occasionally. Bench space is at the premium in my "lab".
After going back and forth between the Rigol and Siglent I decided to go with Siglent (I have the Rigol DS scope). It's a newer unit and it has 14 bit DACs on both channels, Rigol's 2nd channel is 12 bit. I also read that the software support on the Rigol unit is problematic. I liked the Rigol form factor better, which is why it was a tough decision.
Anyways my Siglent is supposed to arrive today.
Yeah, feeding high voltage back into the output isn't very nice.Yeah sorry for your trouble. Need to watch how I apply signals with it.
If you are interested in sending in a Guest Blogger Submission,welcome to write for us!
All Comments ( 0 )